🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 289+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Vintage Sterling Silver 925 Bulldog Charm

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.1 out of 5 (289 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$15​
$25
Sale
βœ“ no-cost delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vintage Sterling Silver 925 Bulldog Charm So cute!!

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy dispatch
↩️
easy-to-use Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Sterling Silver 925 Bulldog Charm

Vintage Sterling Silver 925 Bulldog Charm
So cute!!​

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 443705

Category: Vintage > Antiques > Collectibles

Original Price: $25 USD

Sale Price:$15 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 shipping & Returns

βœ“ on the house delivery on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 7236 reviews
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
The Vintage Sterling Silver 925 Bulldog Charm is practical and solid.​
21 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· San Antonio, TX

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Totally worth it
From my experience, the Vintage Sterling Silver 925 Bulldog Charm is practical and it’s fine overall.
48 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely ideal
Personally, it works as described and it meets expectations.
31 people found this helpful​
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· solely-arrived York, NY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent Vintage Sterling Silver 925 Bulldog Charm!
After certain use, it feels okay which feels reasonable.
44 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Denver, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fancy it!
the Vintage Sterling Silver 925 Bulldog Charm works as described so it’s acceptable.
30 people found this helpful