๐Ÿšš no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.9/5 from 199+ reviews
Kids โœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Boy WWE Pajama Shorts

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.9 out of 5 (199 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$13
$21.67
Sale
โœ“ no-cost delivery on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Like new. It has no flaws. The shorts are truly tender and made out of silky material.

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
quick Shipping

โ†ฉ๏ธ
easy Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Boy WWE Pajama Shorts

Like new. It has no flaws. The shorts are exceptionally silky and made out of silky material.

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Kids products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 645781

Category: Kids > Boys Bottoms > Boys (4+)

Original Price: $21.67 USD

Sale Price:$13 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand simply-arrived

๐Ÿšš distribution & Returns

โœ“ no-cost shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.9
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 3120 reviews
AW
Ashley White โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Baltimore, MD
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
simply what I wanted
After a few use, it is practical which feels reasonable. Packaging was straightforward.
21 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Sacramento, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
certainly impressed
At first, the Boy WWE Pajama Shorts works as described and Iโ€™m satisfied.
47 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท St. Louis, MO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Five stars!
The Boy WWE Pajama Shorts arrived quickly.
47 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago ยท Seattle, WA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Couldn't be happier
Honestly, it performs as expected which feels reasonable.
39 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Chicago, IL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
fancy love love!
After certain use, it performs as expected and it works for me.
45 people found this helpful